YouTubers and the Malaysian Youths:

An Exploration into Digital Parasocial Relationships

Authors

  • Belinda Fong Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), UKM
  • Eric Olmedo Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), UKM
  • Peng Kee Chang Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), UKM

Keywords:

parasocial relationships, YouTube , new media studies , youth, digital culture

Abstract

A growing number of young media consumers are turning to online video platforms, with YouTube in particular attracting massive numbers of users and subscribers. As a result, these statistics increase the attraction of the celebrities, or YouTubers, featured in the videos. They gain viewers and worldwide recognition by their public presence and utilisation of vast marketing strategies. According to the concept of parasocial interactions, YouTube users may form links with the celebrities they view online. This study will extend previous research on the development of parasocial relationships conducted by Rubin and McHugh (1987) and Kurtin, O’Brien, Roy and Dam (2018) on social media to determine if such a relationship exists in the Malaysian community on YouTube. The results of a structural equation model were slightly similar to the original ones, proving that watching YouTube was a significant predictor of both social and physical attraction, regardless of ethnicity. The moderating variable of online comments introduced to the framework showed significant contribution to the development and the formation of parasocial ties, which increased the value of relationships. Overall, the results support applying parasocial interaction theory to the YouTube context in Malaysia.

 

Article History: Received: 13 March 2023| Accepted: 1 April 2023 | Published: 3 April 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/joeds-2023-0101-05

Author Biography

Belinda Fong, Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), UKM

*Corresponding Author

Email: fong_belinda@yahoo.co.uk

References

Aran-Ramspott, S., Fedele, M., & Tarrago, A. (2018). YouTubers' social functions and their influence on pre-adolescence. Communicar: Media Education Research Journal, 57, 71-79.

Aripin, N., Ismail, A., Ishak, M., Rahman, N., Rahman, M., Madon, M., & Mustaffa, M. (2016). YouTube dan generasi muda Islam: Satu pendekatan kelompok fokus dalam kalangan pelajar universiti. Jurnal Komunikasi -Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 165-188.

Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R., & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 86-101.

Auter, P. (1992). TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 173-181.

Auter, P., & Palmgree, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Communication Research Reports, 17(1), 79-89.Auter, P., & Palmgreen, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Commun. Res. Rep., 17 , 79–89.

Aw, E.-X., & Chuah, S. (2021). Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationshipswith social media influencers: the role of self-discrepancy. Journal of Business Research, 132, 146-157.

Aw, E.-X., & Labrecque, L. (2020). Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 895-908.

Baek, Y., Bae, Y., & Jang, H. (2013). Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users' psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 16(7), 512-517.

Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 16, 74-94.

Bellantine, P., & Martin, B. (2005). Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 197-201.

Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.

Blanchot, M., & Rottenberg, E. (1997). Friendship.Palo Alto, CA, USA, : Stanford University Press.Boerman, S. (2020). The effects of the standardized Instagram disclosure for micro-and meso-influencers. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 199-207.

Bond, B.(2016). Following your "friend": Social media and the strength of adolescents' parasocial relationships with media personae. . Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 19(11), 656-660.

Boon, S., & Lomore, C. (2001). Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults: Explaining perceptions of celebrity influence on identity. Hum. Commun. Res. , 27, 432–465.

Boyd, D. (2007). Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Public in Teenage Social Life. In D. (. Buckingham, MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning -Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume(p. 12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Breves, P., Amrehn, J., Heidenreich, A., Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2021). Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers . InternationalJournal of Advertising, 40(7), 1209-1229.

Brown, W. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial itneraction, identification and worship. Communication Theory, 25(3), 259-283.

Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online Reviews: Do Consumers Use Them? Adv. Consum. Res., 28 , 129–133.Chen, C. (2014). Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1-23.

Choi, G., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2017). Giving a new makeover to STEAM: Establishing YouTube beauty gurus as digital literacy educators through messages and effects on viewers. Computers in Human Behaviour, 73, 80-91.

Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: implications for celebrity endorsement . Psychology and Marketing, 34(4), 481-495.

Click, M., Lee, H., & Holladay, H. (2013). Making monsters: Lady Gaga, fan identification, and social media. Popular Music and Society, 36(3), 360-379.

Cocker, H., & Cronin, J. (2017). Charismatic authority and the YouTuber: Unpacking the new cults of personality. Marketing Theory, 1-18.

Danyaro, K., Jaafar, J., De Lara, R., & Downe, A. (2010). An evaluation of the usage of Web 2.0 among tertiary level students in Malaysia. IEEE Xplore Digital Library, , 1-6.

De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828.

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 51, 629.

Dibble, J. L., & Rosaen, S. F. (2011). Parasocial interaction as more than friendship: evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures. J. Media Psychol. 23, 122–132.

Dibble, J., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21-44.

Digital Business Labs. (2022, July 26). Social Media Penetration in Malaysia [Research]. Retrieved from Digital Business Labs -Cultural Insights in Asia: https://digital-business-lab.com/2022/07/%E2%91%A1-social-media-penetration-in-malaysia-research/

Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media.New York: Oxford University Press.Dijk, K. (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspect of New Media.London: SAGE Publications.Duffy, B. (2020). Social Media Influencers. In The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication (pp. 1-4).

Fisherkeller, J. (1997). Everyday learning about identities among young adolescents in television culture. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 28(4), 467-492.

Frederick, E., Choong, H., Clavio, G., & Walsh, P. (2012). Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 481-502.

Frederick, E., Choong, H., Clavio, G., Pederson, P., & Burch, L. (2014). Choosing between the one-way or two-way street: An exploration of relationship promotion by professional athletes on Twitter. Communication & Sport, 2(1), 80-99.

Gass, R., & Seiter, J. (2015). Persuasion: Social influence and compliance gaining.Routledge.Gelb, B., & Johnson, M. (1995). Word-of-mouth communication: Causes and consequences. J. Health Care Mark., 15, 54–58.

Gill, P., Arlitt, M., Li,Z., & Mahanti, A. (2007). YouTube Traffic Characterisation: A View from the Edge. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, (pp. 15-28).

Gleason, T., Theran, S., & Newberg, E. (2017). Parasocial Interactions and Relationships in Early Adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 1-11.

Grant, E., Guthrie, K., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1991). Television shopping: A media system dependency perspective. Communication Research, 18, 773-798.

Han, S., & Yang, H. (2018). Understanding adoption of intelligent personal assistants. Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 118, 618–636.

Hartmann, T., & Goldhorn, C. (2011). Horton & Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers' experience of parasocial interaction . Journal of Communication, 61, 1104-1121.

Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., & Vorderer, P. (2001). Avatare: Parasoziale Beziehungen zuvirtuellen Akteuren“ [Avatars: Parasocial relationships to virtual social entities]. . Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 3, , 350–368.

Hasan, H. (2013). Using YouTube as a tool to learn verb tenses (unpublished dissertation).Retrieved from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Hellweg, S., & Andersen, P. (1989). An analysis of source valence instrumentation in the organizational communication literature. Manag. Commun. Q., 3, 132–159.

Hidalgo-Mari, T., & Segarra-Saavedra, J. (2017). The YouTuber phenomenon and its transmedia expansion: Analysis of youth empowerment in social media. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 15, 43-56.

Hoerner, J. (2010). Scaling the web: A Parasocial Interaction Scale fur world wide web sites. In D. Schuman, & E. (. Thorson, Advertising and theWorld Wide Web(pp. 135-148). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Holmbom, M. (2015, June). The YouTuber: A Qualitative Study of Popular Content Creators (Unpublished Dissertation).Retrieved from Umea University: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-105388

Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass Communication and Parasocial Interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.

Iftikhar, M., Riaz, S., & Yousaf, Z. (2019). Impact of YouTube Tutorials in Skill Development among University Students of Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 5(2), 125-138.

Jin, S., & Park, N. (2009). Parasocial interaction with my avatar: Effects of interdependent self-construal and the meaning role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game, Wii. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 12(6), 723-727.

Joinson, A. (2008). Lookingat, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp. 1027-1036). New York: ACM Press.

Joseph, W. (1982). The credibility of physically attractivecommunicators: A review. J. Advert. , 11, 15–24.

Juhary, J. (2012). Online comments for language learning: a pilot study. Procedia Technology, 1, 297-302.Kanazawa, S. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 23, 167-171.

Karandashev, V., & Fata, B. (2014). Change in physical attraction in early romantic relationships. . Interpersona Int. J. Pers. Relatsh., 8, 257–267.

Keenan, A., & Shiri, A. (2009). Sociability and social interaction on social networking website. Library Review, 58(6), 438-450.

Kemp, S. (2022, February 15). DIGITAL 2022: MALAYSIA.Retrieved from Data Report Portal: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-malaysia

Khairi, I. (2015). 10 Statistik dan Fakta Terkini Pengguna Internet di Malaysia.Retrieved from OpenEdu: http://www.openedu.com/my/dl/Laportan10.pdf

Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191-208.

Khan, M. (2016). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behaviour, 66, 236-247.

Kiesler, C., & Goldberg, G. (1968). Multi-dimensional approach to the experimental study of interpersonal attraction: Effect of a blunder on the attractiveness of a competent other. Psychol. Rep., 22., 693–705.

Kim, D., & Kim, H. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: a nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223-232.

Kim, K. (2018). The effects of interpersonal attraction on service justice. J. Serv. Mark., 32, 728–738.

Koenig, F., & Lessan, G. (1985). Viewers' relations to television personalities. Psychological Reports, 57, 263-266.Kruhlinskaya, M. (2022). "Literally giving the main character vibes" -Examiningemotional capital and parasocial relationships on YouTube (Unpublished Thesis).Retrieved from Uppsala Universitet.

Kurtin, K., O'Brien, N., Roy, D., & Dam, L. (2018). The Development of Parasocial Relationships on YouTube. Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 233-252.Labrecque, L. (2014). Fostering consumer -brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 134-148.

Lee, C., & Giles, H. (2008). Attraction in context: How contextual differences in personal and social attraction affect communication accommodation behavior. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, (pp. 22–26). Quebec, Canada.

Leite, F., & Baptista, P. (2021). The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: the role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.

Levy, M. (1979). Watching TV news as parasocial interaction. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 69-80.

Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters–An inventory of 60 years of research. Commun. Res. Trends, 38 , 4–31.

Lim, Y., & Van Der Heide, B. (2015). Evaluating the wisdom of strangers: The perceived credibility of online consumer reviews on Yelp. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun., 20, 67–82.

Liu, C., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2020). The impact of self-congruity andvirtual interactivity on online celebrity brand equity and fans’ purchase intention. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(6), 783-801.

Lofft, Z. (2020). When social media met nutrition: How influencers spread misinformation, and why we believe them. Health Science Inquiry, 11(1), 56-61.

Loiacono, E., Watson, R., & Goodhue, D. (2007). WebQual: An instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. Int. J. Electron. Commer., 11, 51–87.

Lopes, I., Guarda, T., Victor, J., & Vazquez, E. (2020). The influence of YouTubers in Consumer Behaviour. In Marketing and Smart Technologies(pp. 49-58). Singapore: Springer.McChesney, R. (2013). Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet against Democracy.New York; London: The Free Press.

McCroskey, J.,Hamilton, P., & Weiner, A. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. . Hum. Commun. Res., 1, 42–52.

McCroskey, J., Larson, C., & Knapp, M. (1981). An introduction to Interpersonal Communication.Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.

McCruskey, J., & McCain, T. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monogr, 41, 261–266.

Mohd Faizal, N., Rosidayu, S., & NorAdzrah, R. (2014). Can Twitter be an Effective Platform for Political Discourse in Malaysia? A Study of #PRU13. Procedia -Social and Behavioural Sciences 155, 348-355.

Moraes, M., Gountas, J., Gountas, S., & Sharma, P. (2019). Celebrity influences on consumer decision making: new insights and research directions. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(13-14), 1159-1192.

Pappas, I., & Woodside, A. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310.

Pavlou, P. (2003). . Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer., 7, 101-134.

Perez, C. (2021). Parasocial relationships with influencers on YouTube: Relatability and trust as predictos and manifestations of PSI and PSR (unpublished thesis0.Retrieved from Florida State University.Perse, E., & Rubin, R. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. . Commun. Res., 16, 59–77.

Pettigrew, T. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 49, 65–85.

Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. . J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 34, 243–281.

Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behav. Inf. Technol., 20, 347–356.

Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2000). You really are a great big sister’—Parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. . J. Mark. Manag., 36, 279–298.

Rihl, A., & Wegener, C. (2019). YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: Using feedback channels in mediatised relationships.Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 25(3), 554-566.

Rubin, A., & Perse, E. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246-268.

Rubin, A., & Step, M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media, 44, 635–654.

Rubin, A., Perse, E., & Powell, R. A. (1985). loneliness, parasocial interaction and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), , 155–180.

Rubin, R., & McHugh, M. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292.

Salyer, A., & Weiss, J. (2020). Real, close friends: The effects of perceived relationships with YouTube microcelebrities on compliance. Popular Culture Studies Journal, 8(1), 139-156.

Sanz-Blas, S., Bigné, E., & Buzova, D. (2017). m-WOM in a brand’s Facebook fan page. Online Inf. Rev., 41, 936–953.Savage, M., & Spense, P. (2014). Will you listen? AN examination of parasocial interaction and credibility in radio. Journal of Radio and Audio Media, 21(1), 3-19.

Schimmelpfennig, C., & Hunt, J. (2020). “Fifty years of celebrity endorser research: support for a comprehensive celebrity endorsement strategy framework. Psychology and Marketing, 37, 488-505.

Schmid, H., & Klimmt, C. (2011). A magically nice guy: Parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. International Communication Gazette, 73(3), 252-269.

SilverMouse Marketing. (2022, December 13). WINNERS OF MALAYSIA’S YOUTUBE WORKS AWARDS 2022 ANNOUNCED.Retrieved from SilverMouse: https://www.silvermouse.com.my/blog/malaysia-youtube-works-awards-2022-winners/#:~:text=According%20to%20YouTube%20Internal%20Data,their%20TV%20in%20May%202022.Smith, D. (2015). Imagining others more complexly: Celebrity and the ideology of fame among YouTube's 'Nerdfighteria'. Celebrity Studies, 1-15.

Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742.

Stever, G., & Lawson, K. (2013). Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 339-354.

Strangelove, M. (2010). Watching YouTube: Extraordinary videos by ordinary people.Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.

Su, B., Wu, L., Chang, Y., & Hong, R. (2021). Influencers on social media as references: Understanding the importance of parasocial relationships. Sustainability, 13, 1-19.

Tankovska, H. (2021). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2021, ranked by number of active users.Retrieved from Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-socialnetworks-ranked-by-number-of-users/Thumim, N. (2012). Self-Representation and Digital Culture.Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave.

Torres, P., Augusto, M., & Matos, M. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: an exploratory study. Psychology and Marketing, 36(12), 1267-1276.

Tsiotsou, R. (2015). The Role of Social and Parasocial Relationships on Socail Networking Sites Loyalty. Computers in Human Behaviour, 48, 401-414.

Tze, S., & Hassan, H. (2021). The search for national identity in the discourse analysis of YouTube comments. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 1806-1821.

Van Dijck, J. (2013). Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Vorderer, P. (1996). Picard, Brinkmann und Co. als Freunde der zuschauer” [Media personalities as friends of the television viewer]. In P. Vorderer (eds.), "Fernsehen als Beziehungskiste”. Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit Tv-Personen(pp. 153–171). Opladen: Westdeutscher verlag.

Vorderer, P., & Knobloch, S. (1996). “Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serieniguren. Ergänzung oder Ersatz?” [Are parasocial relationships a substitute or supplement?]. Medienpsychologie, 8, 201–216.Walther, J., & Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered. Handb. Interpers. Commun., 3, 529–563.

Walther, J., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., & Shulman, H. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Commun. Res., 36, 229–253.

Wan Husin, W. N., Abdul Halim, N., & Zul Kernain, N. F. (2020). Students’ perceptions on ethnic tolerance in Malaysia: A study in three public universities. Ethnicities, 0(0), 1-22.

Westenburg, W. (2016). The influence of YouTubers on teenagers (Unpublished Master's thesis).Retrieved from University of Twente, Netherlands: https://essay.utweente.nl/71094/1/Westenberg_MA_BMS.pdf

Xiang, L., Zheng, X., & Hu, X. (2014). What Drives Social Commerce: The Role of parasocial Interaction. . Proceeding of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2014) , (p.86). Chengdu, China.Yen, W., Chang, C., & Chou, S. (2019). More than just fame: Learning from Internet celebrities -Uses and Gratifications perspective. In L. R. (Eds), ICITL 2019, LNCS 11937(pp. 407-416).

Yoon, H., & Tourassi, G. (2014). Analysis of online social networks to understand information sharing behaviours through social cognitive theory. Proceedings of the 2014 Biomedical Sciences and Engineering Conference.

Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: the roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133-147.

Zarella, D. (2010). The Social Media Marketing Book.Canada: O'Reilly Media, Inc.

Downloads

Published

03-04-2023

How to Cite

Fong, B., Olmedo, E., & Chang, P. K. (2023). YouTubers and the Malaysian Youths: : An Exploration into Digital Parasocial Relationships. Journal of Ethnic and Diversity Studies (JOEDS), 1(1). Retrieved from https://joeds.com.my/index.php/home/article/view/10