The Flow of History:
Hegel's Historical Idealism Vs. Geussian-Benjaminian's Historical Realism
Keywords:
History, Idealism, Realism, Historical Continuity, Historical DiscontinuityAbstract
This paper aims to study the concept of history in two opposite dimensions: idealism vs realism. As the background of discussion, I start by introducing GWF Hegel’s progressive reading of history. With this approach, Hegel would like to demonstrate history in a linear and rationalistic perspectives as symbolizes in his famous dictum, "what is rational is real; and what is real is rational." As a result, this teleological perspective portrays the concept of history in a closed history and totally encompassing the past/present/future. I would argue this optimism and normative view of history is highly problematic. Following that, I invite Raymond Geuss who argues that certain society has its sense of locatedness and metaphysical need. This argument based on his proposal that each and every society should be understood in its specific historical context. It is at this point, I link the discussion to Walter Benjamin's "On the Concept of History" by illustrating the discontinuity flow of history. Unlike Hegel, Benjamin views history as non-linear. Therefore, contrary to Hegel’s optimistic reading of history, it seems that Benjamin's historical conception is likely pessimistic. To conclude, inspired by Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, I discuss the tension between Hegel's historical idealism and GeussianBenjaminian's historical realism by suggesting that our history is apparently trapped into the power of present time; where the present has become too broad: capturing altogether the recorded past and the predictable future.
Article History: Received: 12 September 2023| Accepted: 1 December 2023 | Published: 9 December 2023
References
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London & New York: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Benjamin, Walter. 2007. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books.
Benjamin, Walter. 1996. Selected Writings(Volume 4), Howard Finland & Michael W. Jennings (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real History. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2014. Our Broad Present: Time and Contemporary Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hardimon, Michael O. 1994. Hegel's Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 2005. Philosophy of Right, trans. S. W. Dyde. New York: Dover Publications.
Loewy, Micheal. 2005. Fire Alarm: Reading Walter Benjamin's 'On the Concept of History',trans. Chris Turner. New York: Verso.
Pensky, Max. 2004. 'Method and Time: Benjamin's Dialectical Images', in David S. Ferris (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177-198.
Popper, Karl. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies: The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the Aftermath (Volume 2). London: Routledge.
Stern, Robert. 2006. 'Hegel's Doppelsatz: A Neutral Reading', Journal of the History of Philosophy44(2): 235-266.
Trentin, Filippo. 2013. ''Organizing Pessimism': Enigmatic Correlations between Walter Benjamin and Pier Paolo Pasolini', The Modern Language Review108(4): 1021-1041.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ramze Endut
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0): This license allows for non-commercial use, sharing, and distribution of the work, but prohibits modification, adaptation, and derivative works.
